Re: Interrupts vs signals

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Interrupts vs signals
Date: 2021-11-11 14:06:01
Message-ID: CA+TgmobVnFHGww-7z6vC1Ht63Pj-Kus4dFYPOp2zgMY2M6_iDw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 12:27 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Depending on how you implement them, one difference could be whether / when
> > "slow" system calls (recv, poll, etc) are interrupted.
>
> Hopefully by now all such waits are implemented with latch.c facilities?

Do read(), write(), etc. count? Because we certainly have raw calls to
those functions in lots of places.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2021-11-11 14:21:59 Re: Should AT TIME ZONE be volatile?
Previous Message Jonathan S. Katz 2021-11-11 13:54:41 Re: 2021-11-11 release announcement draft