Re: pg_check_dir comments and implementation mismatch

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_check_dir comments and implementation mismatch
Date: 2015-02-02 20:48:33
Message-ID: CA+TgmobV_i-0H=OEtAbEbkkrTOSrvCUXE2Ji-nQdzyQDOLQuAA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Marco Nenciarini
<marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> wrote:
> Il 30/01/15 03:54, Michael Paquier ha scritto:
>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> There is at least one other bug in that function now that I look at it:
>>> in event of a readdir() failure, it neglects to execute closedir().
>>> Perhaps not too significant since all existing callers will just exit()
>>> anyway after a failure, but still ...
>> I would imagine that code scanners like coverity or similar would not
>> be happy about that. ISTM that it is better to closedir()
>> appropriately in all the code paths.
>>
>
> I've attached a new version of the patch fixing the missing closedir on
> readdir error.

If readir() fails and closedir() succeeds, the return will be -1 but
errno will be 0.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2015-02-02 20:49:03 Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-02-02 20:38:43 Re: Release note bloat is getting out of hand