| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: W-TinyLfu for cache eviction |
| Date: | 2015-12-08 19:45:03 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobV+EyQzAxK6aO3nC8w069PPFijuex0t45sjz5TBzWYCw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov
<sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've recently noticed W-TinyLfu cache admission policy (see [1]) being
> used for caffeine "high performance caching library for Java 8".
> It demonstrates high cache hit ratios (see [2]) and enables to build
> high-throughput caches (see caffeine in [3])
> Authors explicitly allow implementations of the algorithm (see [4]).
>
> Does it make sense to evaluate the algorithm for buffer replacement?
Maybe. Want to code it up?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-12-08 19:47:23 | Re: PostgresNode::_update_pid using undefined variables in tap tests |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-12-08 19:36:57 | Re: Fwd: Another little thing about psql wrapped expanded output |