Re: Declarative partitioning

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning
Date: 2015-11-05 16:29:48
Message-ID: CA+TgmobUi=u1TswwFoi+TU_+XZvJhTrxG-JgZ0OrJmOe7cX87g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> The DDL and catalogs part are not much different from what I had last
> described though I took a few steps to simplify things. I dropped the
> multi-level partitioning bit

Hmm, that doesn't sound good to me. I think multi-level partitioning
is a reasonably important use case.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-11-05 16:36:51 Re: FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-11-05 16:27:49 Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c