From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: static assertions in C++ |
Date: | 2017-08-31 21:42:59 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmobUcdiP54KfhDybZX-3E9TMn=jA9cFmXZ4SeAEe1ANVaQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Commit df1a699e5ba3232f373790b2c9485ddf720c4a70 introduced a
> StaticAssertStmt() into a header file, which will fail if a module
> written in C++ uses that header file. Currently, that header file is
> not widely used, but it's a potential problem if the use of static
> assertions expands.
>
> As discussed in
> <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7775.1492448671@sss.pgh.pa.us>, a
> more general solution would be to add specific C++ support for static
> assertions in c.h. Here is a patch for that, extracted from my
> previously posted C++ patch set, but also a bit reworked from what was
> previously posted.
I like the concept of being more C++-compatible, but I'm not sure
about the idea of not providing a workaround, given that we went to
the extreme of doing this:
#define StaticAssertStmt(condition, errmessage) \
((void) sizeof(struct { int static_assert_failure :
(condition) ? 1 : -1; }))
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-31 22:37:09 | Re: static assertions in C++ |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-08-31 20:43:00 | static assertions in C++ |