Re: static assertions in C++

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: static assertions in C++
Date: 2017-08-31 21:42:59
Message-ID: CA+TgmobUcdiP54KfhDybZX-3E9TMn=jA9cFmXZ4SeAEe1ANVaQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Commit df1a699e5ba3232f373790b2c9485ddf720c4a70 introduced a
> StaticAssertStmt() into a header file, which will fail if a module
> written in C++ uses that header file. Currently, that header file is
> not widely used, but it's a potential problem if the use of static
> assertions expands.
>
> As discussed in
> <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7775.1492448671@sss.pgh.pa.us>, a
> more general solution would be to add specific C++ support for static
> assertions in c.h. Here is a patch for that, extracted from my
> previously posted C++ patch set, but also a bit reworked from what was
> previously posted.

I like the concept of being more C++-compatible, but I'm not sure
about the idea of not providing a workaround, given that we went to
the extreme of doing this:

#define StaticAssertStmt(condition, errmessage) \
((void) sizeof(struct { int static_assert_failure :
(condition) ? 1 : -1; }))
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-08-31 22:37:09 Re: static assertions in C++
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-08-31 20:43:00 static assertions in C++