| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Regarding BGworkers |
| Date: | 2013-08-14 01:10:11 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobTVe5QH5X=jyD1T1j4-XWJDgRtZo69UmnDttTvYGVFBw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> maybe_start_bgworker() in postmaster.c
>> do_start_bgworker() in postmaster.c
>> StartBackgroundWorker() in bgworker.c
> This formulation is fine, thanks. Instead of maybe_start_bgworker,
> what about start_bgworker_if_necessary?
I think Alvaro's suggestion is better. It's shorter, and makes clear
that at most one will be started.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-08-14 02:16:31 | CREATE TRANSFORM syntax (was Re: [PATCH] Add transforms feature) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-08-14 01:09:06 | dynamic shared memory |