From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: shm_mq fix for non-blocking mode |
Date: | 2015-10-22 20:45:57 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmobT2m=cgNeiyR4+XQ_7MatWDdnPdoNMUweEz3HR9eS_tw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The shm_mq code handles blocking mode and non-blocking mode
> asymmetrically in a couple of places, with the unfortunate result that
> if you are using non-blocking mode, and your counterparty dies before
> attaching the queue, operations on the queue continue to return
> SHM_MQ_WOULD_BLOCK instead of, as they should, returning
> SHM_MQ_DETACHED. The attached patch fixes the problem. Thanks to my
> colleague Rushabh Lathia for helping track this down.
>
> (There's are some further bugs in this area outside the shm_mq code
> ... but I'm still trying to figure out exactly what they are and what
> we should do about them. This much, however, seems clear-cut.)
...and so I've committed it and back-patched to 9.4.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-10-22 20:50:12 | Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-10-22 20:32:43 | Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query |