From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, konstantin knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Unlogged tables cleanup |
Date: | 2019-05-29 20:39:50 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmobSgQrrRc40z96EAiSah2tw5vn+UHoTnBaY4ohfQxXiKg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 10:11 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> If we should do something about such cases, then this brings us back
> to do (INIT | CLEANUP) at the end of recovery anyway?
I believe that could fix problems #1 and #2, but we'd have to think
about what new issues it would introduce.
#3 seems like it needs a different fix.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Donald Dong | 2019-05-29 20:43:56 | Re: Different row estimations on base rels |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2019-05-29 20:36:38 | Re: Different row estimations on base rels |