| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely |
| Date: | 2015-06-05 13:46:08 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobQtFgvY1VR509Xvso5UvmoLb9kD8-gQeTAObH6UHCyUw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Painting it as the unilateral actions of one committer is uncharitable,
> at best.
As I see it, it is just stating the facts. There were several emails
from other committers on the pg_audit thread not that long before it
was committed, and zero of them were supportive. None of them were
dead-set against it, but it is not our typical way of doing business
to press forward with committing something when that many doubts have
been expressed. I believe you will struggle to find comparable
examples involving other patches.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-06-05 14:00:01 | Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2015-06-05 13:45:25 | Re: Memory leak with XLogFileCopy since de768844 (WAL file with .partial) |