Re: Timing overhead and Linux clock sources

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Ants Aasma <ants(dot)aasma(at)eesti(dot)ee>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Timing overhead and Linux clock sources
Date: 2012-08-28 14:43:07
Message-ID: CA+TgmobPiq5E+3b2sRT94BhuZTj2tpvf=CVnJ0tNk+U9JBNWKg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> After staring at all the examples I generated again, I think Bruce is right
> that the newer format he's suggesting is better.

OK by me, then. If you're happy, I'm happy.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-08-28 14:47:28 Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-08-28 14:04:29 Re: MySQL search query is not executing in Postgres DB