Re: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation

On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> So, having received feedback from Tom and others in relation to this
>> patch, I would like to state how I think I should go about addressing
>> various concerns to ensure that a revision of the patch gets into the
>> 9.2 release. As I've said time and again, I think that it is very
>> important that we have this, sooner rather than later.
>
> Nothing can be ensured completely, but I would add this is a very
> important feature. Without it, large systems without prepared
> statements are mostly untunable and therefore untuned, which is a bad
> thing.

I, too, am pretty excited about the potential for this feature.
Having not read the patch I'm not able to comment on code quality or
design at this point, but I'm definitely +1 on the concept.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company