| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v11 |
| Date: | 2018-03-13 18:36:44 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobO6-v77MaUGZCk7VReYDaL-kke_8seWrS_RGwJ1CO-Pg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Currently a handful of explain outputs in the regression tests change
> output when compiled with JITing. Therefore I'm thinking of adding
> JITINFO or such option, which can be set to false for those tests?
Can we spell that JIT or at least JIT_INFO?
I realize that EXPLAIN (JIT OFF) may sound like it's intended to
disable JIT itself, but I think it's pretty clear that EXPLAIN
(BUFFERS OFF) does not disable the use of actual buffers, only the
display of buffer-related information.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-03-13 18:40:36 | Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v11 |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-03-13 18:31:40 | Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions |