Re: Extend pgbench partitioning to pgbench_history

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Extend pgbench partitioning to pgbench_history
Date: 2024-05-14 15:53:46
Message-ID: CA+TgmobNCMm7E=kJshhroBcG9MmzJD3nixXbD41=23M=RkLydQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 3:14 PM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> [ review comments ]

Since there has been no response to these review comments for more
than 3 months, I have set https://commitfest.postgresql.org/48/4679/
to Returned with Feedback. Please feel free to update the status when
there is a new version of the patch (or at least a response to these
comments).

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2024-05-14 15:54:48 Re: An improved README experience for PostgreSQL
Previous Message Robert Haas 2024-05-14 15:36:05 Re: elog/ereport VS misleading backtrace_function function address