From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql - add special variable to reflect the last query status |
Date: | 2017-09-12 19:16:19 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmobMtv+uzBmcezCBPAnCBSn5TZ01pyRFMx-UpQKsc4qFZg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I think this is a bad plan. Right now, libpq sets no SQLSTATE for
>> internally generated errors; it is almost certain that there are
>> applications testing for an empty SQLSTATE to notice when they're
>> getting an error from libpq. EnterpriseDB had a support ticket quite
>> recently where this precise behavior was at issue. Changing it will
>> break stuff, so we shouldn't do it unless there's a really compelling
>> benefit. Universally returning PQ000 is not a sufficient improvement
>> over universally returning the empty string to justify the risk of
>> application breakage.
>
> I don't think I want to buy this argument, because the logical conclusion
> of it is that we can never fix libpq to offer proper SQLSTATEs for
> client-side errors. Admittedly, the fact that nobody's bothered to do so
> in ~15 years may indicate that nobody cares ... but I would think that
> at least it'd be useful to distinguish, say, ENOMEM from connection loss.
> Saying we can't do it for compatibility reasons doesn't sound great
> to me. Especially when you've not provided any hard evidence as to why
> the current lack-of-information is useful.
Well, if we provided a different SQLSTATE for each qualitatively
different type of libpq error, that might well be useful enough to
justify some risk of application breakage. But replacing a constant
string that we've had for ~15 years with a different constraint string
isn't doing anything about the lack-of-information problem you're
complaining about.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-09-12 19:16:56 | Re: domain type smashing is expensive |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-09-12 19:12:35 | Re: psql - add special variable to reflect the last query status |