Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: "jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com" <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com" <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb
Date: 2019-03-12 18:20:11
Message-ID: CA+TgmobMGTfkMY-isz4pLw_bfywVOqTUDcW+obeAfYSeTBJM7A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:05 PM Jamison, Kirk <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> I was thinking of something like the attached,

+ machine. Note that this option isn't passed to the
+ <application>vacuumdb</application> application by default.

The words 'by default' should be removed here, because there is also
no non-default way to get that behavior, either.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-03-12 18:32:16 Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participate in comparisons
Previous Message Paul Ramsey 2019-03-12 18:08:15 Re: Compressed TOAST Slicing