Re: archive modules

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Subject: Re: archive modules
Date: 2021-11-02 16:16:17
Message-ID: CA+TgmobM+uOL+qiuv0xDep+KeV9wkdCbkFnSeaDtaHyostqj1g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 12:10 PM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
> Yes, that seems doable. My point is that I've intentionally chosen to
> preload the libraries at the moment so that it's possible to define
> PGC_POSTMASTER GUCs and to use RegisterBackgroundWorker(). If we
> think that switching archive modules without restarting is more
> important, I believe we will need to take on a few restrictions.

I guess I'm failing to understand what the problem is. You can set
GUCs of the form foo.bar in postgresql.conf anyway, right?

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2021-11-02 16:18:14 Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box?
Previous Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-11-02 16:10:07 Re: archive modules