From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why does logical replication launcher exit with exit code 1? |
Date: | 2017-08-02 20:52:01 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmobLFBLe5=SNEmznyOwkRqUwFn-0oVNr6Jh+0FqvdVcF7A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Maybe it doesn't need to be logged at all (other than perhaps as DEBUG)?
> A few months ago, people were complaining about too many messages about
> background workers starting. Now we are having complaints about
> messages about background workers stopping.
I actually don't think it's that unreasonable to get notified when
system-wide processes like the autovacuum launcher or the logical
replication launcher start or stop. That's stuff somebody might want
to know. It's not going to generate a lot of log volume, and it might
be useful, so why suppress it?
Where things get ugly is if you start to get a high rate of messages -
e.g. from starting and stopping parallel query workers or other kinds
of things where you might have workers starting and stopping very
frequently. But surely this isn't an example of that.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-08-02 20:57:57 | Re: Why does logical replication launcher exit with exit code 1? |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-08-02 20:46:41 | Re: POC: Cache data in GetSnapshotData() |