Re: pgindent

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgindent
Date: 2016-04-27 15:56:57
Message-ID: CA+TgmobKZYA55nKqZ-a6sAyVMbFzG85MNy-pqDuWWy6qYH9rxg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Agreed. Sounds like a good plan --- a better plan than I have used in
> the past.

Thinking about this a bit more, what I am inclined to do is:

1. Run pgindent.

2. Read the diff and revert any changes that look icky.

3. Commit the rest.

4. Run pgindent again and post the diff. Discuss how to fix the
ickiness contained therein, then proceed accordingly.

How does that sound?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2016-04-27 15:57:17 Re: pgindent
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-04-27 15:51:42 Re: pgindent