| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Review of Row Level Security |
| Date: | 2012-12-21 14:19:18 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobKMp12W8nNGN-XUHscpY1N8so5PZKWOxJH0YDdwg79mA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 3:56 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> It's unreasonable for people to demand a feature yet provide no
> guidance to the person trying (hard) to provide that feature in a
> sensible way.
You've got it backwards. All the issues that are being discussed now
on this thread have been discussed previously on prior threads about
row-level security. For the most part, nobody other than KaiGai and I
participated in those, and we had a consensus hammered out that was
reflected in the patch that started this thread. The person insisting
on an eleventh-hour design change is you.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-12-21 14:21:00 | Re: Feature Request: pg_replication_master() |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-12-21 14:17:20 | Re: Review of Row Level Security |