Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date: 2022-02-11 20:47:44
Message-ID: CA+TgmobJm08VZoGFf6BF5+itrhb2fo=AeJTpDDZMu8vhvK9F5w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 3:40 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> I'm not really sure any single parameter name is going to capture the
> subtlety involved here.

I mean to some extent that's inevitable, but it's not a reason not to
do the best we can.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-02-11 20:48:01 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-02-11 20:46:45 Re: support for CREATE MODULE