Re: synchronous_commit and remote_write

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: synchronous_commit and remote_write
Date: 2012-05-09 15:43:07
Message-ID: CA+TgmobJVxotSyZa9Vwcz4_WuoKGXCerT3JK_Ahbgzo1DWz0rQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> It does provide an additional guarantee, but I accept you personally
>> may not find that useful.
>
> The guarantee is that if Postgres crashes, we don't lose any data, but
> not if the OS crashes (right?) because that isn't clear now.

True, point taken.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2012-05-09 16:13:28 Re: age(xid) on hot standby
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-05-09 14:34:59 Re: age(xid) on hot standby