| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age? |
| Date: | 2023-04-24 16:09:45 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobJUe2_oivkc3t8UyVPg5RMaVpENm3BQkT+PuCyjm3A3w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 8:36 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> The one thing that IMO makes it less confusing is to have it return the
> value rather than modifying it in place.
Yeah, I don't understand why we have these functions that modify the
value in place. Those are probably convenient here and there, but
overall they seem to make things more confusing.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Imseih (AWS), Sami | 2023-04-24 16:20:08 | Re: Correct the documentation for work_mem |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2023-04-24 16:04:19 | Re: Memory leak in CachememoryContext |