Re: Comment patch for index-only scans

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Comment patch for index-only scans
Date: 2014-05-06 13:06:52
Message-ID: CA+TgmobHcneQHvyTnhgzX8WH+wYNG21r4igs0ODzztVTsrU2kw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> If I recall correctly, Tom pointed out a while back that the comment
> justifying the lockless read of the VM bit was not correct (or at least
> not complete).
>
> I rewrote it, but it was part of a patch that was not accepted. Attached
> is the comment patch only.

Looks reasonable to me.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2014-05-06 13:22:20 Re: [PATCH] `pg_dump -Fd` doesn't check write return status...
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-05-06 13:04:52 sb_alloc: a new memory allocator for PostgreSQL