Re: Perf Benchmarking and regression.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Perf Benchmarking and regression.
Date: 2016-05-12 15:27:31
Message-ID: CA+TgmobH1u5OCbT93aJ=3C8jzKXHgSbyT715MxsrNza7B=NB4A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Could you run this one with a number of different backend_flush_after
> settings? I'm suspsecting the primary issue is that the default is too low.

What values do you think would be good to test? Maybe provide 3 or 4
suggested values to try?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-05-12 15:33:24 Re: "Allow usage of huge maintenance_work_mem for GIN build" patch
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-05-12 15:13:25 Re: Perf Benchmarking and regression.