| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: global / super barriers (for checksums) |
| Date: | 2019-12-17 18:38:43 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobH=Ku42_0889zjd75PbTfgp2HL=3VuAMinOV9tTNAgZQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 2:54 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I'd either add a test (if we have some) or placeholder kind
> initially. But I'd also be ok with going for either of the other
> versions directly - but it seems harder to tackle the patches together.
OK. I have committed 0001-0003 as I had mentioned last week that I
intended to do. For 0004, I have replaced "sample" with "placeholder"
and added comments explaining that this is intended to be replaced by
the first real user of the mechanism. If there are no further
comments/objections I'll go ahead with this one as well.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v4-0001-Extend-the-ProcSignal-mechanism-to-support-barrie.patch | application/octet-stream | 23.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mahendra Singh | 2019-12-17 18:39:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum |
| Previous Message | Mahendra Singh | 2019-12-17 18:10:17 | Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line |