Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date: 2015-10-09 19:35:18
Message-ID: CA+TgmobGpGJd7=6Tf_NLqaqQBDR=PvcmpF-GuCY5rS2kV=zzbw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Sounds like both the approaches have some pros and cons, also there are
> some people who prefer mini-language and others who prefer JSON. I think
> one thing that might help, is to check how other databases support this
> feature or somewhat similar to this feature (mainly with respect to User
> Interface), as that can help us in knowing what users are already familiar
> with.

+1!

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2015-10-09 20:23:56 Re: Some questions about the array.
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-10-09 19:33:51 Re: More work on SortSupport for text - strcoll() and strxfrm() caching