Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ian Barwick <ian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL
Date: 2015-01-23 17:10:09
Message-ID: CA+TgmobGj4fYvC_tFt8KcGN=xYpyj1_S8_Wtf3XChYO=uyEU3w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm still nervous about overloading this onto the roles system; I think it
> will end up being very easy to accidentally break. But if others think it'll
> work then I guess I'm just being paranoid.

I agree with you. I don't hear anyone who actually likes that
proposal except for Stephen. The list of people who don't like it
seems to include the patch author, which strikes me as a rather
significant point.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-01-23 17:18:49 Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-01-23 17:06:07 Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)