| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgindent-polluted commits |
| Date: | 2016-01-14 16:32:38 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobGKmt+DmZwLrcoHUhZnGgC5j7quWLh6dEvNy7HjAq+3w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> I do think it makes life easier when going through the git history if
> semantic changes are separated from formatting changes.
I agree. And I agree with Mark Dilger's point, too.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-01-14 16:38:41 | Re: Python 3.x versus PG 9.1 branch |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-01-14 16:31:03 | Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794 |