Re: needless complexity in StartupXLOG

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: needless complexity in StartupXLOG
Date: 2021-07-30 12:39:15
Message-ID: CA+TgmobDBeog2XASGXJGRa2xHK-hboq5UHJj4OnhgCT_koksdw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 3:16 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Not sure there's enough concensus on the idea for that. I personally
> think that's a good approach at reducing relevant complexity, but I
> don't know if anybody agrees...

There does seem to be agreement on the proposed patch, so I have committed it.

Thanks to all for the discussion and the links to other relevant threads.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com 2021-07-30 13:23:40 RE: Parallel Inserts (WAS: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks..)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-07-30 12:38:01 Re: Segment fault when excuting SPI function On PG with commit 41c6a5be