| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach |
| Date: | 2018-02-02 14:11:58 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobD6i_wCb0dvkv3vtGkS006RxVTXf27EQBhqeTjCRPq-g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 9:48 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 9:09 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:08 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I think suggesting to use this API to wait "for a specific worker"
>>> doesn't seem like a good idea as it doesn't have any such provision.
>>
>> I see your point, but in the absence of a more specific API it could
>> be used that way, and it wouldn't be unreasonable. Just might wait a
>> little longer than absolutely necessary.
>
> Fair enough, you can proceed with the patch.
Committed. Now, on to the main event!
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Claudio Freire | 2018-02-02 14:13:35 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Vacuum: Update FSM more frequently |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-02-02 13:59:29 | Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping |