| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we update the random_page_cost default value? |
| Date: | 2025-10-09 12:05:37 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobD6Edv-6zh+9L7pntSVgpq9_AGYvOdcseyNh2a_BUW0A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 8:16 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> I rewrote the random_page_cost docs, attached, to remove a focus on
> magnetic disk, and added network latency as a reason for
> random_page_cost being low. I removed the specific caching numbers and
> went with a more generic description.
>
> I would normally apply this only to master, but given the complaints in
> this thread, maybe I should backpatch it.
This seems fine to me but I won't be surprised if other people have
some complaints. :-)
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2025-10-09 12:08:05 | memory leak in dbase_redo() |
| Previous Message | Shinya Kato | 2025-10-09 12:04:20 | Re: Add mode column to pg_stat_progress_vacuum |