Re: "Some tests to cover hash_index"

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "Some tests to cover hash_index"
Date: 2016-08-23 14:09:11
Message-ID: CA+TgmobCM-01hs32saJRYGtwXhzO9KzmYLvDGO+SfXboErCPUA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:17 AM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I have also removed the warning message that we used to get for hash index like 'WARNING: hash indexes are not WAL-logged and their use is discouraged' as this message is now no more visible w.r.t hash index after the WAL patch for hash index. Please have a look and let me know your thoughts.

Well, that change should be part of Amit's patch to add WAL logging,
not this patch, whose mission is just to improve test coverage.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Antonin Houska 2016-08-23 14:10:25 Question about MVCC-unsafe commands
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2016-08-23 14:07:50 Re: Logical decoding of sequence advances, part II