Re: Garbled comment in postgresGetForeignJoinPaths

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>> --> * reconstruct the row for EvalPlanQual(). Find an alternative local path
>>>> Should the marked line simply be deleted? If not, what correction is
>>>> appropriate?
>>
>>> Hmm, wow. My first thought was that it should just say
>>> "reconstructing" rather than "reconstruct", but on further reading I
>>> think you might have the right idea.
>>
>> The current text of the comment dates to commit 177c56d60, and looking at
>> that commit makes it pretty clear that the line I'm complaining of
>> belonged to the previous text; it evidently just missed getting deleted.
>
> Got it. Nice forensics, and sorry about the good.

... goof.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company