Re: apply_scanjoin_target_to_paths and partitionwise join

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, arne(dot)roland(at)malkut(dot)net, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: apply_scanjoin_target_to_paths and partitionwise join
Date: 2025-12-05 18:18:12
Message-ID: CA+TgmobBjWakSakDeECa-ApBRfsid5wJUu3Tgo5SxUtWt6B-CQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 9:53 PM Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> But I admit that I am unsure if this addresses
> any real problems, so the effort might not be justified. I agree that
> maybe we should just go ahead with your current patch and see what
> happens.

Thanks, I have committed that patch. So far the buildfarm seems OK...

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Borodin 2025-12-05 18:36:42 Re: IPC/MultixactCreation on the Standby server
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2025-12-05 18:09:37 Re: Tighten up range checks for pg_resetwal arguments