| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump files |
| Date: | 2016-04-06 01:46:31 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobBUJt1jgNwBha6pLhYWAajEv09pVRkTvvNfa3Z_62DqQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Given the lack of any other complaints about this, I'm okay with the
>>> approach as presented. (I haven't read the patch in detail, though.)
>>
>> FWIW, I am still of the opinion that the last patch sent by Peter is
>> in a pretty good shape.
>
> Great. I've marked this patch as "Ready for Committer" in the
> CommitFest application.
Peter, are you going to commit this? Feature freeze is in just a few days.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-04-06 01:47:43 | Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-04-06 01:45:26 | Re: Proposal: "Causal reads" mode for load balancing reads without stale data |