| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hash Indexes |
| Date: | 2016-10-27 21:22:49 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobB6O7do6M+5ncmoyhwSa9FpcAKAVJ-SnJ2kvBaDbw_kw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Amit, can you please split the buffer manager changes in this patch
>> into a separate patch?
>
> Sure, attached patch extend_bufmgr_api_for_hash_index_v1.patch does that.
The additional argument to ConditionalLockBuffer() doesn't seem to be
used anywhere in the main patch. Do we actually need it?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karl O. Pinc | 2016-10-27 21:57:40 | Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2016-10-27 21:21:49 | Re: make coverage-html on OS X |