Re: why is PG_AUTOCONF_FILENAME is pg_config_manual.h?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: why is PG_AUTOCONF_FILENAME is pg_config_manual.h?
Date: 2014-12-02 16:58:00
Message-ID: CA+TgmobAvH5KGYY2T7yGQoY7ZMXB47Q_tu2LrZp5V7U6iZo+6A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> Surely that's not a value that we expect users to be able to edit. Is
>> pg_config_manual.h just abused as a place that's included everywhere?
>>
>> (I suggest utils/guc.h as a better place.)
>
> +1

+1

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Kukushkin 2014-12-02 16:59:53 Report search_path value back to the client.
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2014-12-02 16:54:12 Re: 9.2 recovery/startup problems