| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahila(dot)syed(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys |
| Date: | 2022-12-13 16:42:58 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobACwxSfw=WEx=3UKXS6hBwG+Kn9aAyOW3Vtch=6qTQXg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 11:37 AM Drouvot, Bertrand
<bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > It seems kind of unfortunate to have to add payload to a whole bevy of
> > record types for this feature. I think it's worth it, both because the
> > feature is extremely important,
>
> Agree and I don't think that there is other option than adding some payload in some WAL records (at the very beginning the proposal was to periodically log a new record
> that announces the current catalog xmin horizon).
Hmm, why did we abandon that approach? It sounds like it has some promise.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ronan Dunklau | 2022-12-13 16:45:46 | Re: Ordering behavior for aggregates |
| Previous Message | Drouvot, Bertrand | 2022-12-13 16:37:18 | Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys |