Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date: 2022-03-31 14:05:10
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob9jMSdkHmWUmDJXtVU2-jSP5Sr6ZRDPkbA0jrqxaDvkA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 3:52 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 0001 is changing the strategy to file copy during initdb and 0002
> patch adds the test cases for both these cases.

IMHO, 0001 looks fine, except for needing some adjustments to the wording.

I'm less sure about 0002. It's testing the stuff Andres mentioned, but
I'm not sure how good the tests are.

Andres, thoughts? Do you want me to polish and commit 0001?

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2022-03-31 14:10:53 Re: CLUSTER on partitioned index
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-03-31 13:49:50 Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set