From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stefan Litsche <stefan(dot)litsche(at)zalando(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: More stable query plans via more predictable column statistics |
Date: | 2015-12-09 02:18:29 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob9P5wcTcm78q=mRwzaPT9ZB2CfcRHZpe26C-p_orbJ_g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Still, maybe we should try to sneak at least this much into
>> 9.5 RSN, because I have to think this is going to help people with
>> mostly-NULL (or mostly-really-wide) columns.
>
> Please no. We are trying to get to release, not destabilize things.
Well, OK, but I don't really see how that particular bit is anything
other than a bug fix.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2015-12-09 02:19:51 | Re: Passing initially_valid values instead of !skip_validation to StoreRelCheck() in AddRelationNewConstraints() |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-12-09 02:14:54 | Re: [PATCH] Equivalence Class Filters |