From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <christoph(dot)berg(at)credativ(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Useless "Replica Identity: NOTHING" noise from psql \d |
Date: | 2014-04-07 16:03:49 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob8Jb0FT1dUHnwKY5-hkFXqmem1_tn3=1M3LauQnS=AWg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2014-04-03 14:49:54 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> I've been kind of hoping that someone would step up on both these items, but
>> the trail seems to have gone cold.
>>
>> I'm going to put out the new buildfarm release with the new module to run
>> test_decoding check. But of course It won't have MSVC support.
>>
>> These can go on my long TOO list unless someone else gets there first.
>
> So, I was thinking on how we can improve this situation. There's
> basically one bigger remaining problem besides make check vs. make
> installcheck:
> Currently contrib modules can't easily run isolationtester in a general
> fashion. That's why test_decoding's Makefile has to rig that all
> itself. How about simply improving the contrib support to recognize
> tests in ISOLATION_REGRESS in addition to the current REGRESS? Then we
> can "simply" train vcregress.pl to pick them up generally, without
> special support for test_decoding.
IMHO, that's a fine idea.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-04-07 16:18:04 | Re: Including replication slot data in base backups |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-04-07 16:00:49 | Re: Fwd: Proposal: variant of regclass |