Re: ALTER SYSTEM vs symlink

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER SYSTEM vs symlink
Date: 2015-11-02 21:08:13
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob7yEM8YxKJPq2=wbwkhxerV-HVWDU+SE69i=m1epaM8g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>> Two different methods of restricting ALTER SYSTEM have already been
>> discussed on this thread: one using file permissions, and the other
>> using ProcessUtility_hook. I personally think that's good enough.
>
> The issue which I have with these suggestions is that one requires users
> to install an as-yet-unwritten module and the other is to hack with
> permissions in the data directory. As we've all seen, people playing in
> $PGDATA is generally a bad idea.

Well, fair enough. I think somebody could write that module in about
an hour, though. All you have to do is latch onto ProcessUtility_hook
and throw an error if you've got yourself an AlterSystemStmt.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Haribabu Kommi 2015-11-02 21:10:12 Re: BUG #13741: vacuumdb does not accept valid password
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-11-02 21:07:18 Re: Patch to install config/missing