| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Michael Paquier |
| Date: | 2016-02-08 21:47:00 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob7mtUanR7n4h6F2c7BU9YaEs-6iOKuwKYSrw6mridmpQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> This came up today in connection with buildfarm database access. My policy
> (before the server move) has been that access is granted to committers who
> are also on the -security list. However, Michael is not a committer, and has
> requested access.
>
> I've actually thought for some time that there is plenty of reason to give
> him a commit bit, so at Stephen's suggestion I'm raising that question. He's
> done plenty of good work, including on Windows where we still need plenty of
> help from time to time, and managed a commitfest or two, so he seems quite
> well qualified.
You have sent this email to the public list rather than the private
one which you probably intended.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2016-02-08 21:50:42 | Re: Michael Paquier |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2016-02-08 21:42:02 | Michael Paquier |