Re: Inverse of pg_get_serial_sequence?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inverse of pg_get_serial_sequence?
Date: 2014-09-03 13:31:50
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob6XVWPZ-GWs_5vEov5LVq5whtbS-MRHc5ZodoFq8QDQQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> We have pg_get_serial_sequence() mapping (relation, colum) to the
> sequence. What I'm missing right now is the inverse. I.e. given a
> sequence tell me the owner.
> describe.c has a query for that, and it's not too hard to write, but it
> still seems 'unfriendly' not to provide it.
>
> Does anybody dislike adding a function for that?

I'll go out on a limb and say that it sounds like pointless catalog
bloat to me. I am all in favor of adding things like this where the
SQL query is painful to write (e.g. things involving pg_depend) but if
it's a simple SELECT query then, eh, not really excited about it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-09-03 13:36:32 Re: Misleading error message in logical decoding for binary plugins
Previous Message Joel Jacobson 2014-09-03 13:25:31 Re: PL/pgSQL 2