| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Douglas Doole <dougdoole(at)gmail(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Push limit to sort through a subquery |
| Date: | 2017-08-25 17:33:03 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob6OS=7eY7STK3J8B6R0Xh+p2urU4pBnBpX-ajAbbFb2A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Awesome. What's the business with enable_hashagg in the regression test stuff?
>
> Just relocating that "reset" so that it only affects the test case it's
> needed for. (I think the 0-worker test was inserted in the wrong place.)
Oh, hmm. Well, no objection to that, I guess. Thanks for working on this.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-25 18:01:20 | Re: [PATCH] Push limit to sort through a subquery |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-25 17:31:48 | Re: [PATCH] Push limit to sort through a subquery |