| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Sven R(dot) Kunze" <srkunze(at)mail(dot)de>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Keith Fiske <keith(at)omniti(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning |
| Date: | 2017-05-10 18:10:56 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob5fHQx1sddm86trw9fv6v2U10RiZ0ZXxRSohRigkM9-Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm surprised that there is so much activity in this thread. Is this
> patch being considered for pg10?
Of course not. Feature freeze was a month ago.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-05-10 19:22:05 | Re: Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn() |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-05-10 18:10:16 | Re: Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn() |