From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Odd query execution behavior with extended protocol |
Date: | 2015-10-06 22:20:39 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob5VY5=JVFuWWMMq1Adp4aOHLJ2__z477PdjGfWDd475g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> I'm concerned though whether this would amount to a protocol break.
>
>> Me, too.
>
> There are enough CCI's floating around the code that there may not
> actually be any observable problem, at least not in typical cases.
> That would explain the lack of complaints ...
It's pretty to think so, but I've been doing this long enough to be skeptical.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-10-06 22:21:33 | Re: Tsvector editing functions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-10-06 22:18:04 | Re: Odd query execution behavior with extended protocol |