Re: SegFault on 9.6.14

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SegFault on 9.6.14
Date: 2019-08-12 23:58:03
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob5Rp9hqSeiFHOaJSjgGr3XogNU6gnCrutGxt_ts1N4jg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:48 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> To clarify my position --- I think it's definitely possible to improve
> the situation a great deal. We "just" have to pass down more information
> about whether rescans are possible. What I don't believe is that that
> leads to a bug fix that would be sane to back-patch as far as 9.6.

Sounds like a fair opinion. I'm not sure how complicated the fix
would be so I don't know whether I agree with your opinion, but you
usually have a fairly good intuition for such things, so...

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2019-08-13 00:14:32 Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2019-08-12 23:15:42 Re: pg_stat_replication lag fields return non-NULL values even with NULL LSNs