removing tsearch2

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)berkus(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov(at)google(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Cynthia Shang <cynthia(dot)shang(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: removing tsearch2
Date: 2017-02-10 11:28:05
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob5R8aDHiFRTQsSJbT1oreKg2FOSBrC=2f4tqEH3dOMAg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2017-02-09 19:19:21 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> > > Also, our experience with contrib/tsearch2 suggests that the extension
>> > > shouldn't be part of contrib, because we have zero track record of getting
>> > > rid of stuff in contrib, no matter how dead it is.
>> >
>> > Let's nuke tsearch2 to remove this adverse precedent, and then add the
>> > new thing.
>> >
>> > Anybody who still wants tsearch2 can go get it from an old version, or
>> > somebody can maintain a fork on github.
>>
>> Works for me.
>
> +1

OK, that's three votes in favor of removing tsearch2 (from core,
anyone who wants it can maintain a copy elsewhere). Starting a new
thread to make sure we collect all the relevant votes, but I really,
really think it's past time for this to go away. The last actual
change to tsearch2 which wasn't part of a wider cleanup was
3ca7eddbb7c4803729d385a0c9535d8a972ee03f in January 2009, so it's been
7 years since there's been any real work done on this -- and the
release where we brought tsearch into core is now EOL, plus three more
releases besides.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-02-10 12:12:10 Re: removing tsearch2
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-02-10 11:04:08 Re: parallelize queries containing initplans