From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Loaded footgun open_datasync on Windows |
Date: | 2018-06-04 21:01:52 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob5NtZE2-Zi2TF2092kVXPODOzBQTyja7UNYRN1NUCzEQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:56 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> When things come to VMs or containers, developers and users tend to be
> sloppy regarding the hardware being used, and they are not usually aware
> that the database running within it is sensitive to such details. Many
> folks use Postgres, so IMO having defaults which are safe without
> relying on hardware characteristics is a rather sensible approach. (Got
> bitten by that in the past, not everybody is careful). My 2c.
Maybe we should also adopt that approach on macOS.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-06-04 21:15:54 | Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-06-04 20:50:05 | Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported |